In June of 2018, six months before it published the infamous Amber Heard op-ed, The Washington Post published a repulsive article, Why Can’t We Hate Men?
This #MeToo inspired rant was written by the director of women’s studies at Northeastern University, who had the gall to openly and shamelessly express a Nazi-like hatred for men in a major American newspaper.
Does anyone else believe that by printing an article that by its very name must be considered “hate speech”, the Post falls short of the true spirit of its “Democracy Dies in Darkness” slogan?
Does anyone else think that the article echoes anything from the ugly history of Europe in the middle of the 20th century?
If you don’t see it, think about the term “the patriarchy” the author references and that is also mindlessly used by many people. Do you think that in the same way that the Nazi’s use of a “Jewish conspiracy” aided in perpetuating hate and violence against Europe’s Jews, the use of the term “the patriarchy” aids in perpetuating hate and violence against men?
If you think the comparison is exaggerated, then how do you reconcile Mona Eltahawy, an Egyptian-American feminist published in the Post who, in a 2019 radio interview, called for the use of “justifiable violence” against men and imagines “… a scenario in which we kill a certain number of men every week” to “dismantle the patriarchy”? Or ultra-radical Valerie Solanas, author of the SCUM Manifesto — the Society for Cutting Up Men — who called for not only destruction of the patriarchy, but also the complete elimination of the male sex? These are not the only women calling for male genocide:
Christine Fair, associate professor at Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service: “All of them deserve miserable deaths while feminists laugh as they take their last gasps. Bonus: we castrate their corpses and feed them to swine? Yes.” — 2019 tweet
Mary Daly, former Boston College feminism professor: “If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males. The world would be better off with dramatically fewer men.”
Sally Miller Gearhart, college feminism professor: “…the ratio of men to women must be radically reduced so that men approximate only ten percent of the total population.” — “The Future — If There is One — is Female”, 1982
#killallmen: this hateful hashtag might not literally call for male genocide; some claim it’s “humor”, but does anyone think that a #killallwomen would be considered funny?
Today’s Patriarchy is Feminism’s Equivalent of the “Jewish Conspiracy” of the 20th Century
Feminists have lied about an imagined male conspiracy, “The Patriarchy”, in the same way that the Nazis lied about the “Jewish conspiracy” of Nazi Germany. The only difference is the target of hatred:
“Men, through male social, political and economic institutions, consciously and deliberately conspire against women via a system of economic discrimination” that (according to Gloria Steinem) “uses violence or the subliminal threat of violence” to enforce its will over women.”
To repeat: In the same way that the Nazi’s use of “Jewish conspiracy” aided in perpetuating hate and violence against Europe’s Jews, the use of the term “The Patriarchy” aids in perpetuating hate and violence against men.
It’s bad enough that feminists have been so successful in spreading their hateful lie about this imagined Patriarchy to the naiveté of so many malleable minds.
What’s sadder still is that the purported evil “Patriarchy” is actually the opposite of what a “patriarchal culture” implements. Anyone who cavalierly references “Patriarchy” should read the chapter “The Evolution of Patriarchy” in a book by Herbert Purdy titled Their Angry Creed: The shocking history of feminism, and how it is destroying our way of life:
“Patriarchy is the way things developed through history. In simple terms, men are pre-disposed physiologically to protect, through their greater musculature, their generally superior strength, and their generally greater height, and this automatically confers a leadership role. … It really is just as simple as that, and it has nothing to do with control, or a desire to control. Quite the reverse: men will sacrifice their health, their safety, their enjoyment of family life and their children, yes, even their lives in the pursuit of their inherent, inherited role [emphasis added]. It is all easily explained in terms of psycho-physiological differences between men and women that set limits on the roles and behaviours [English spelling] of each. It is important to clarify the difference between dominance and domination, terms that are used ambiguously these days, mainly by feminist propagandists to justify what they call patriarchy, and to denigrate men and maleness.”
For other articles about the many lies told by feminists, see my Feminist Lies section.
By Stephen Bond on October 6, 2022.
Exported from Medium on February 28, 2023.