Idiot Hypocrisy: The Post Continues to Propagate the Myth of a "Gender Pay Gap"
When will the newspaper stop helping spread a feminist lie?
Feminists have mastered an incredible Jedi mind trick ability to convince the world of things that are obviously false. To provide simple evidence that doesn't require (much) reading, I'm using images to visually illustrate why so many of feminism's sacred beliefs are just idiot feminist hypocrisy.
This installment examines a recent illustrated article in the Washington Post that affirms the purported “gender pay gap”, Closing the gender pay gap one job offer at a time.1
Each illustration from the Post article is presented below with contrasting images and comments that show why the gender wage gap is nothing more than idiot feminist hypocrisy. (Note that 65% of the posted comments were negative.2 )
(For an alternative view of the dark side of women and the #MeToo movement, please visit two other “Idiot Hypocrisy” posts here and here. Prepare to have your feminist sensibilities offended.)
The U.S. national women’s soccer team actually makes more than the men’s team and female top models make up to 28 times as much as their male counterparts!
This, then, is the power of the pay gap myth: even when women actually earn more than men, they have been so completely brainwashed and convinced that they’re perpetual victims of pay discrimination, they’ve entirely blinded themselves to inconvenient facts that prove otherwise.
The following cartoon aptly summarizes the truth of the gender pay gap:
The “closing the gender gap” article was produced as part of a new “The Big Shift” series, where Post analyzes the shift in the financial position of women. The article was primarily by freelance writer Rebecca Powers and illustrator Sharee Miller, with the support of Big Shift team members Bronwen Latimer (editor), Hannah Good (editor), Jordan Melendrez (copy editor), Christine Ashack (design editor), Betty Chavarria (design editor), Marian Chia-Ming Liu (project editor).
Comment examples:
Would someone please explain why to the rest of the group.
If a company can pay a woman or a minority 17% +/- less for the same gig and receive the same output .
Why would any for profit company ever hire a white straight man?
This gender pay gap has been debunked so many time in various studies I’m surprised the WaPo is still pushing it.
And the USWNT lost their court case because they earned more than the men.
Several good posts below about this mostly being a myth. Maybe since WaPo is losing readers, they need to do these kinds of stories to keep their base happy & still subscribing.